help me visualize how this program uses dp to solve a problem. The program: #include #include #include #include using namespace std; int minDeletions(string s) { int n = s.size(); if (n == 0) return 0; // dp[i][j] = minimum deletions to clear substring s[i..j] vector> dp(n, vector(n, 0)); // Base case: one letter is always one operation for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { dp[i][i] = 1; } // Build up from shorter substrings to longer for (int len = 2; len <= n; len++) { for (int i = 0; i + len - 1 < n; i++) { int j = i + len - 1; // Option 1: remove s[i] alone, then the rest dp[i][j] = 1 + dp[i+1][j]; // Option 2: try to merge s[i] with a matching character later for (int k = i+1; k <= j; k++) { if (s[k] == s[i]) { // cost to delete the middle part + dp for block starting at k int cost = dp[i+1][k-1] + dp[k][j]; dp[i][j] = min(dp[i][j], cost); } } } } return dp[0][n-1]; } int main() { string s; cout << "Enter the string: "; cin >> s; cout << "Minimum operations to delete string: " << minDeletions(s) << endl; return 0; } the problem: Minimum operations required to make a string empty. In one ops can only delete one block at a time. This block will only contain the same character. It can be of length 1

视频信息

答案文本 复制

视频字幕 复制

Welcome to our visualization of dynamic programming for the string deletion problem. The goal is to delete an entire string using the minimum number of operations. In each operation, we can only delete one block of consecutive identical characters. For example, with the string 'aabaa', we can delete the first 'aa' block, then the 'b', then the final 'aa' block, requiring 3 operations total. The dynamic programming solution uses a 2D table where dp[i][j] represents the minimum operations needed to delete substring from index i to j. The base cases are the diagonal elements where i equals j, representing single characters. Each single character requires exactly one operation to delete, so all diagonal elements are set to 1. The table is filled diagonally from bottom-left to top-right, building solutions for larger substrings from solutions of smaller substrings. Today we'll explore a dynamic programming solution for the string deletion problem. Given a string, we want to delete all characters using the minimum number of operations. The constraint is that each operation can only delete a consecutive block of identical characters. For example, with the string 'abaa', we can delete the single 'b' in one operation, then delete the remaining 'aaa' block in another operation, giving us a total of 2 operations. We solve this using dynamic programming with a 2D table. The state dp[i][j] represents the minimum operations needed to delete the substring from index i to j. Our base case is that any single character requires exactly one operation to delete. We build the solution from shorter substrings to longer ones, filling the table diagonally from the main diagonal outward. For each cell dp[i][j], we consider two main options. Option 1 is to delete character s[i] alone as a single block, which costs 1 operation plus the cost of deleting the remaining substring from i+1 to j. Option 2 is to find a matching character s[k] later in the string where s[k] equals s[i]. We can then delete s[i] together with s[k] in the same block operation, but first we need to clear the characters between them. The cost becomes the sum of clearing the middle part and the cost from position k onwards. We take the minimum cost among all valid options. Let's trace through the calculation step by step for the string 'abaa'. We start with base cases where all single characters require 1 operation. For length 2 substrings, 'ab' and 'ba' each need 2 operations since characters don't match, but 'aa' only needs 1 operation since they're identical. For longer substrings, we apply our transition rules, considering both options for each case. Finally, dp[0][3] gives us the answer for the entire string, which is 2 operations. The algorithm has O(n³) time complexity because we have O(n²) states in our DP table, and each state requires checking up to n possible transitions. The space complexity is O(n²) for the DP table. This problem demonstrates classic dynamic programming principles: optimal substructure and overlapping subproblems. The bottom-up approach ensures we solve smaller subproblems before larger ones. This pattern appears frequently in string processing and optimization problems where we have multiple choices at each step. We're solving a dynamic programming problem about string deletion. Given a string, we want to find the minimum number of operations to make it empty. In each operation, we can delete one block of consecutive identical characters. For example, with the string 'abaa', we can delete the single 'b' in one operation, leaving 'aaa', then delete the entire block 'aaa' in another operation. This gives us a total of 2 operations. Now let's understand the dynamic programming approach. We define dp[i][j] as the minimum operations needed to clear substring from index i to j. The base case is simple: any single character requires exactly 1 operation to delete. For the transition, we have two main options. First, we can delete the character at position i alone, costing 1 operation plus the cost to clear the remaining substring. Second, we can try to merge character i with any matching character k later in the string, which requires clearing the middle part between i and k, plus clearing from k onwards. The DP table has a specific structure. Since we only consider substrings where i ≤ j, we get an upper triangular matrix. The diagonal contains our base cases where each single character costs 1 operation. We fill the table by increasing substring length, starting from length 1, then 2, then 3, and so on. The bottom-right corner will contain our final answer for the entire string. For our example string 'abaa', we have 4 characters at indices 0, 1, 2, and 3. Let's trace through the complete calculation for the string 'abaa'. We start by filling the diagonal with base cases - each single character requires 1 operation. For length 2 substrings, 'ab' and 'ba' need 2 operations each since the characters don't match, but 'aa' only needs 1 operation since they're identical and can be deleted together. For length 3, we apply our transition rules. Finally, for the full string dp[0][3], we consider three options: delete 'a' alone for cost 3, merge first 'a' with the third 'a' for cost 2, or merge with the last 'a' for cost 3. The minimum is 2, giving us our final answer. Let's summarize the algorithm's complexity and key insights. The time complexity is O(n³) because we have O(n²) states in our DP table, and for each state, we check up to n possible transitions when looking for matching characters. The space complexity is O(n²) for storing the DP table. This problem demonstrates the three key principles of dynamic programming: optimal substructure, where the solution depends on optimal solutions to subproblems; overlapping subproblems, where the same substrings are computed multiple times; and bottom-up construction, building solutions from smaller to larger substrings. This pattern appears frequently in string processing and optimization problems.